?

Log in

No account? Create an account
IMPORTANT Poll: edited for content... - The year was 2081 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
matt

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

IMPORTANT Poll: edited for content... [Dec. 18th, 2002|11:00 pm]
matt
[Current Mood |artisticartistic]

My First Poll: if you routinely read my journal, I'd like it if you could answer these questions.

Poll #85092 obAdultContent

When I post things about non-monogamy and or relationships:

I'd rather not hear about it
0(0.0%)
I'd really like to hear about it
13(68.4%)
I don't mind whether or not I can see it
6(31.6%)

When I post pictures:

I'd rather not have to scroll through icons of the images
1(5.3%)
I really want to see the pictures
12(63.2%)
I don't mind whether or not I see your pictures
6(31.6%)

When I post pictures with non-work-safe/adult content

I'd rather not see them at all, lj-cut tags or no.
0(0.0%)
I really want to see the pictures
6(31.6%)
I don't mind whether or not I see the post, as long as they are shielded behind an lj-cut tag.
13(68.4%)


Thanks!
LinkReply

Comments:
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: hbergeronx
2002-12-19 07:01 am (UTC)

executive decision

I don't want to edit the poll becasue I think that will blank out the entries. But I'm taking it that if people "dont mind" one way or the other, I can make an executive decision in that regard. I will generally always lj-cut images with non-work-safe content, and I will generally always iconize images.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoo_music_girl
2002-12-20 07:11 am (UTC)

Re: executive decision

Clarification would have been good. I thought you meant like the picture you posted when you linked to Isabel Samaras' work. No offence meant, but I wouldn't be comfortable seeing naked pix of you!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: hbergeronx
2002-12-20 08:39 am (UTC)

Re: executive decision

No problem. I doubt that you (or fluffydave, for that matter) want to see that, and I'm not planning on adding you to that filter. I think I intend to post all sort of crazy crap, including some images of me and etc., but i think there's a difference between meme stuff (like the Samaras post), which I would keep public, and more personal or meaningful stuff, which I would want to filer.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: zoo_music_girl
2002-12-20 07:12 am (UTC)

Re: executive decision

Oh, and I do like seeing the pix from your trips, I just mean it's not life or death for me if I see them or not. Depends where I am, the connection is painfully slow at home, but you always do good thumbnails so I don't feel a cut is necessary.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: reddragdiva
2002-12-19 06:58 am (UTC)
I wouldn't subscribe if I didn't want ot read it, although non-worksafe content should be behind an lj-cut tag labeled appropriately. On the assumption that the real function of LJ is to alleviate workplace boooreduuumb.
(Reply) (Thread)