?

Log in

No account? Create an account
on science education - The year was 2081 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
matt

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

on science education [Oct. 25th, 2007|03:25 pm]
matt
[Tags|]

...reviewing responses from more than 80 Bay Area school districts as well as the teachers - made other sobering findings about elementary science instruction in Bay Area schools:

-- About 16 percent of the elementary teachers said they spent no time on science at all. (Most taught at schools that had missed the reading and math benchmarks of No Child Left Behind and were trying to catch up.)

-- Most kindergarten to fifth-grade students typically had science instruction no more than twice a week.

-- Ten times as many teachers said they felt unprepared to teach science (41 percent) than felt unprepared to teach math (4 percent) or reading (4 percent).


from http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/10/25/MNNKSVFOH.DTL


Not sure how much of this is alarmism. I'm not sure I had much in the way of science education before the fifth grade.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: twoeleven
2007-10-26 12:11 am (UTC)
i can't address the specific statistics the article mentions, but a great many schools are reported to have sacrificed a lot of teaching on the altar of no rhetoric left behind.

nor can i say that it's bad that many teachers feel unprepared to teach science. they may be being unusually realistic about their abilities, and merely deluding themselves on teaching the other subjects.
(Reply) (Thread)