?

Log in

No account? Create an account
on free will - The year was 2081 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
matt

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

on free will [Jan. 11th, 2007|08:02 am]
matt
At the moment, the criminal law—in the West, at least—is based on the idea that the criminal exercised a choice: no choice, no criminal. The British government, though, is seeking to change the law in order to lock up people with personality disorders that are thought to make them likely to commit crimes, before any crime is committed.

Such disorders are serious pathologies. But the National DNA Database being built up by the British government (which includes material from many innocent people), would already allow the identification of those with milder predispositions to anger and violence. How soon before those people are subject to special surveillance? And if the state chose to carry out such surveillance, recognising that the people in question may pose particular risks merely because of their biology, it could hardly then argue that they were wholly responsible for any crime that they did go on to commit.

Nor is it only the criminal law where free will matters. Markets also depend on the idea that personal choice is free choice. Mostly, that is not a problem. Even if choice is guided by unconscious instinct, that instinct will usually have been honed by natural selection to do the right thing. But not always. Fatty, sugary foods subvert evolved instincts, as do addictive drugs such as nicotine, alcohol and cocaine. Pornography does as well. Liberals say that individuals should be free to consume these, or not. Erode free will, and you erode that argument.

In fact, you begin to erode all freedom. Without a belief in free will, an ideology of freedom is bizarre. Though it will not happen quickly, shrinking the space in which free will can operate could have some uncomfortable repercussions.

-- from The Economist, Dec 23, 2006 Vol 381, #8509, pp16-17
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: gen
2007-01-11 06:35 pm (UTC)
Most women will agree that when we are in the grip of PMS we are jumpy, hyperemotional, and generally moody. Some women choose to to play this as a 'get out of being a bitch free' card. While others accept the consequences of their actions and try to control them. Part of that whole being human thing.

Guess who I have more respect for? ;)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mactavish
2007-01-12 04:42 am (UTC)
What I hate even worse is that for those of us who don't (or who rarely) have emotional PMS symptoms, it's hard for us to have genuine emotions without, "On the rag?" "Are you expecting your period?" What, I can't be upset or anxious for some reason separate from hormones?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)