?

Log in

No account? Create an account
on microsoft versus linux - The year was 2081 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
matt

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

on microsoft versus linux [Jan. 25th, 2005|11:34 pm]
matt
[Current Mood |contemplativecontemplative]

I now have hands on experience with configuring oracle on both Linux (Red Hat EL3 WS) and Windows (Microsoft XP Pro).

Under nearly identical conditions of operation and configuration, on the same hardware with a full wipe and load of each OS, Windows requires less resident memory. Oracle and RHEL nearly ping the 1g memory on the box, whereas it is only half consumed on the Windows box. Installation, with full instructions on a basically certified distro, required weeks of hacking and plugging and swapping to get the dependencies right on Linux. Windows was more or less plug and play in one day.

They appear to perform with equal stability, with slightly easier boot and reboot configuration and operating stability on Windows.

hmm. not looking good for linux long term on my cluster.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: bovril
2005-01-26 04:16 pm (UTC)
Thos Linux machines are for the real nerds. Even I am not enough of a nerd for a Linux. Like those guys who polish up the engine of the car and change their own oil and talk about the good old days with mechanical carburetters.
(Reply) (Thread)